How NOT to Cope With Bloggers My passion for journalism keeps me in close touch with the newspaper industry, a business whose perilous decline I've documented through my Newspaper Death Watch blog. A trend has been playing out there recently that is relevant to anyone who is trying to cope with the new influence of citizen publishers on their market.

Nearly every major newspaper company has recently seen blogs spring up that speak to their problems and future. Among them are TellZell (Tribune Co.), McClatchy Watch (The McClatchy Co.) and The Gannett Blog(Gannett Co., Inc.) It's the Gannett example that intrigues me most.

The independent Gannett Blog is written by Jim Hopkins, a former Gannett editor and reporter. It covers all kinds of topics related to Gannett's business and its future. These days, that content includes a lot of speculation about layoffs and cutbacks at a company that recently announced it will cut 1,000 jobs, or about 3% of its workforce.

The Gannett Blog has gone viral in its quest to become a sounding board and information source for employees. Jim Hopkins recently revealed some traffic statistics: 91,000 visits and 189,000 page views in the last 30 days. That's serious blog traffic, and much of it comes from Gannett employees who feel they can't get a straight story from their employer. Gannett Blog has become the virtual watercooler for a company of 46,000 people.

The conundrum for Gannett is what to do about Hopkins. So far, it's chosen a strategy of benign neglect. Tara Connell, Gannett's chief spokesman (and interestingly, a former managing editor at USA Today) has gone almost silent recently as rumors have swirled about layoffs and cutbacks, Hopkins says. Meanwhile, traffic has grown. This recent post has drawn more than 160 comments, many of them from people who identify themselves as Gannett employees. People are now actively trading rumors about layoffs at their individual newspapers, with Gannett blog functioning as the gathering point.

Gannett's strategy is worse than "No comment." Not only has the company not contributed its perspective to the flood of comments, it now barely even responds to Hopkins' requests for information, he says. As the chorus of pleas for guidance from the company grows in volume, Gannett becomes more closed and insular. Gannett didn't respond to my own requests for comment.

Gannett is approaching this problem in the worst way possible. Regardless of its opinion of bloggers and citizen journalists, the fact is that The Gannett Blog is drawing huge attention among the company's own employees, who are the most valuable spokespeople it has. Gannett's failure to respond to the speculation and allegations of this critical constituency has become almost as big a story as the company's business problems.

In the new world of citizen-powered publishing, institutions have fewer places to hide than ever. Silence is an invitation to speculation, and individuals now have the means to state their opinions in a very public way. A better course of action for Gannett would be to respond to the comments posted by Jim Hopkins and his readers. Even if that response is a "no comment," it's at least an acknowledgement that their concerns are being noted.

You might argue that an engagement strategy is risky for a publicly traded company. That's just wrong. Public companies live under all kinds of regulations, but there is nothing to prevent them from acknowledging that they care about and listen to the concerns of their stakeholders. Any comment is better than silence.

One of the great ironies of watching the newspaper industry collapse has been to see the same media icons that have long scolded institutions for their insularity become reclusive and inwardly focused when the spotlight is turned on them. Gannett Blog is exhibit A in how not to handle new influencers.

Labels: blogging, gannett, newspapers

  ¶ 10:02 PM 4 Comments Links to this post

  Social Media Tools Don't Matter

From my weekly newsletter. Subscribe using the sign-up box to the right.

Here’s a question I hear from marketers all the time: “We want to launch a corporate blog, but we don’t know how to go about it. Where should we start?”

My answer is that you should start a couple of steps back from where you are. Social media tools – whether they’re blogs, online communities, instructional videos or something else - don’t solve anything unless they address a specific business need. Don’t use social media for its own sake. Use it to accomplish an objective.

Unfortunately, the temptation is difficult to resist. Lots of businesses are experimenting with social media tools these days. It’s natural to think that they know something the rest of us don’t, but the reality is that most people are still kicking tires right now. There are some very successful companies like Apple Computer that are doing nothing with social media because they don’t have to. If the tools aren’t right for your culture or your business, don’t use them.

Whatever you do, don’t start the decision process with technology. The choice of a social media tool is no more relevant to the success of a campaign than is the choice of paint to the structural integrity of a house. Many tools are flexible enough to be used for multiple purposes and some strategic goals require you to leverage many tools in concert.

Stop and consider the problem or opportunity you’re trying to address. Here are a few possible business objectives, with the best tool options listed in parentheses.

• Build customer community (blog, video, social network, private community, virtual world)
• Counter negative publicity (blog, podcast, video, customer reviews)
• Crisis management (blog, video, social network, virtual world)
• Customer conversation (blog, social network, private community, virtual world)
• Generate website traffic (blog, video, customer reviews)

Many more examples will be explored in my forthcoming book, Secrets of Social Media Marketing. It will be available this fall and you can pre-order it on Amazon right now. I also recommend reading Groundswell, the new book by Charlene Li and Josh Bernoff of Forrester Research. It has some excellent advice on how to take a disciplined approach to social media selection.

Note that blogs appear next to every bullet point listed above. That doesn’t mean blogs are a panacea. They are the easiest form of social media to implement, but far greater leverage may derive from more complex tools like customer communities. You should choose media based upon your budget, staff resources and commitment. It’s often best to start small and grow your social media footprint as you become more fluent with the tools. Blogs are a good starting point, but you may need stronger medicine after a while.

Keep in mind the importance of balancing between ease of use, simplicity of deployment and functionality. Many social media tools can be used for multiple purposes. You may be better off starting with a tool that you understand well rather than deploying a somewhat richer solution that carries a steep learning curve.

If you keep the tools secondary and work outward from the business goal, you’re far more likely to reap the rewards of your efforts.

Labels: blogging, social_media, social_media_tools

  ¶ 7:41 AM 1 Comments Links to this post

  Secrets of Blogger Relations From my weekly newsletter. Subscribe using the sign-up box to the right.

Since embracing social media two years ago, Dell Computer has learned a few lessons. One of its key blogger relations people shared some secrets last week in a keynote interview at the New Communications Forum in Santa Rosa, Calif.

Richard Binhammer is charged with monitoring and engaging with the active ecosystem of people who blog about Dell. In a keynote interview with John Cass, Binhammer talked about negativity, a concern often voiced by PR people. Dell has had its share of blogger criticism, going back to the famous Dell Hell incident of three years ago. But by methodically reaching out to complainers, the company reduced negativity from nearly half of all online posts to about 20% in a little less than a year. The secret? "Just talk to people," Binhammer said. Most of the time, all they want is to be heard. Demonstrate that you're listening and you can resolve most complaints.

But here’s an interesting fact: After reducing that negativity factor to 20%, the Dell team has been unable to bring it consistently below that level. Binhammer, whose background is in politics, theorizes that 20% is a natural floor, in the same way that 20% of the population always votes for the same political party, regardless of who runs.

This is worth remembering. Even the best businesses have a few unhappy customers. Your mileage may vary, but you should never expect to achieve 100% satisfaction. It’s more likely that your blogger relations program will get you to a manageable yet stubborn base level. That's your floor, and you probably can't do much to break through it.

Finding Resources
Binhammer also shed some light on how Dell allocates its communications resources. With so many tech bloggers out there, you'd think the company would have a small army of communications folks monitoring and responding to conversations. In fact, it has just two people sharing the job. The reason? Dell is lining up the whole company behind the effort to get more engaged with customers. PR monitors the airwaves, but doesn’t try to resolve every issue. Most comments are forwarded to the appropriate group for response.

I wish more companies would do this. Bloggers tend to be well-informed and passionate, which means that their inquiries and comments demand knowledgeable responses. Companies that simply delegate the response to PR are failing to benefit from the really rich conversations they can have with their most informed customers. Everyone from sales to engineering should want to speak to customers whenever possible. Why let marketing have all the fun?

Labels: blogculture, blogging, corporate_blog

  ¶ 9:53 PM 2 Comments Links to this post

  Daily reading 03/15/2008

Is MySpace Good for Society?

A New York Times columnist asks six thought leaders a simple question: "Has social networking technology made us better or worse off as a society?" Their consensus: both.

The Inconvenient Truth About Social Media Marketing
Aaron wall offers a succinct and persuasive argument against link-baiting. We need more of this rational thinking. Link-baiting is a waste of time.

Corporate Blogging - How the Pros Do It
Scott Monty provides thorough coverage of an SXSW panel on corporate blogging. Includes some nice nuggets, such as Dell's customer relations philosophy: "they've empowered every employee to apologize."

Jeff Jarvis tells why you should reach out to the customers who say they hate you

What happens when 207 people freeze simultaneously for five minutes in Grand Central Station? Watch this...

Labels: blogging, social_media, socialbookmarking

  ¶ 8:30 AM 0 Comments Links to this post

  Bloggers Get Social April 4-6 Now here's a classic Web 2.0-style event! Come and meet other marketing bloggers in NYC for a weekend of fun and socializing April 4-6. In the organizers' words: "Neither summit nor seminar, Blogger Social is "a first-ever, one-of-a-kind event held by the online marketing community for the marketing community, completely funded and coordinated by community members. Neither summit nor seminar, nowhere near a trade show or conference, the intent is a social event...[It's] founded upon the idea of time together to better get to know one another." And no blogging all weekend, they say. You do enough of that, for goodness sake!

It's co-organized by Christina Kerley, an early social media marketing adopter who gets it as well as any marketer I've met. I have to be on the west coast at that time and can't attend, but for $350 (this is New York City, remember!) it looks well worth the cost.

Labels: bloggersocial, blogging, marketing

  ¶ 7:09 PM 0 Comments Links to this post

  Don't Let Tools Distract You I was presenting a social media seminar to a public-relations agency recently when the talk turned to uses of blogs. The people in the room were excited about blogging's potential and were eager to apply the technology to new tasks.

I cautioned them that they were asking the wrong question. The issue isn’t what tool to use, but what problem to solve. Tool selection is secondary.

There's nothing unusual about their attitude. People often start by choosing tools and work backwards to solve problems. Maybe management has just issued an order to start blogging, or the tool is seen as a tactic to improve search performance or it just seems like the thing to do.

But that’s like starting with a hammer and then figuring out what to build with it. If your objective is to make a house, then you’re off to a pretty good start. But if you want to craft a pearl necklace, you've got the wrong tool for the job.

I recently consulted with a client who wanted to build a social network for a defined customer group. It was an ambitious idea, but as we talked through it, we both realized that the process of getting it through internal and regulatory approvals could take a year or more. We finally settled on a more modest idea: Launch a relevant blog, try to build customer interest quickly and then take the results to management in hopes of getting fast-track approval for the social network.

Choose tools wisely
The building blocks of social media are simply tools and they're not well-suited for every task. For example, if your objective is to alert visitors to a new category of products and provide detailed information on the specifics, a catalog page would be more effective than any interactive tool.

But it’s human nature for people to use the technologies they understand and figure out the application after the fact. Unfortunately, that can waste a lot of time and effort. E-mail is terrible for communicating between groups of more than about five recipients, yet people routinely organize massive projects with dozens of participants by e-mail. Even if the tool is poorly suited for the task, they reason, at least people know how to use it.

A better approach is to define business objectives and then search for tools that support them. For customer feedback, for example, blogs and social networks are a good choice. However, podcasts and video won’t do the trick. So if your objective is to improve customer relations, a podcast may not be a good place to start.

Technology vendors encourage the tool focus. Many of those firms are run by engineers who love to create cool new stuff. They’d much rather talk about features and functions than how to solve business problems. You need to block that tactic. Any vendor that won’t give you references to customers who are solving problems that are similar to yours is blowing smoke.

Social media tools are cool, but they’re always irrelevant if they don’t solve problems. Don’t let technology distract you.

Labels: blogging, social_media, social_media_tools

  ¶ 7:56 AM 1 Comments Links to this post

  The TSA's bold move I sometimes tell people, "If your products suck and your customers hate you, don't start a blog."

Well, the Transportation Security Administration has gone against that advice. More power to them.

The TSA blog mostly does it right. The branding is subtle; the TSA logo appears only at the bottom of the page. The slogan - "Terrorists Evolve. Threats Evolve. Security Must Stay Ahead. You Play A Part" - is meant to invite the public into a discussion about security. I think that's a great marketing statement. The traveling public feels that security has been shoved down their throats, which is one of the reasons they hate TSA.

And they took the opportunity to express their emotions; more than 700 comments on the welcome post, according to the blog. There's lots of anger, negativity and obscenity, but also a lot of good ideas and observations from people who clearly know something about security. Give TSA credit. They knew there'd be a firestorm of negativity, they were prepared for it and they responded calmly and constructively.

The blog is written by five people: four mid-level employees and a PR guy. Strangely, there are no photos of the bloggers, but maybe that's a security measure. :-)

As a government agency, TSA could afford to ignore the opinions of travelers if it wanted. Launching the blog is a gutsy move my hat's off to them for it.

And can you believe it? They're hosting the whole thing on Blogger!

Thanks to Daily Dish for the tip via Alex Howard.

Labels: blogculture, blogging, corporate

  ¶ 7:28 AM 0 Comments Links to this post

  Please attend my upcoming Mass TLC presentation on The New Influencers I'll deliver a presentation about the dynamics of social media and online influence on Jan. 24 in Waltham, MA. If you're in the area, please consider coming and supporting the nonprofit Massachusetts Technology Leadership Council, which is sponsoring the presentation. Mass TLC does good work promoting the growth of the technology industry in Massachusetts and throughout New England. If we've never met before, be sure to come up and say hello!

The New Influencers: A Marketer's Guide to the New Social Media
Thursday, January 24, 2008
8:00-10:00am Program
7:45am Registration

Where: Foley Hoag Emerging Enterprise Center
Bay Colony Corporate Center
1000 Winter Street, Suite 400
Waltham, MA 02451

The Mass Technology Leadership Council presents Paul Gillin, author of the book The New Influencers.

Blogging, podcasting and other social media are profoundly disrupting the mainstream media and marketing industries. Paul Gillin's The New Influencers explores these forces by identifying the influencers, their goals and their motivations. The book also offers advice for marketers at both large and small organizations on how to influence the influencers.

This presentation explores:

• Why social media are now so important in consumer decisions
• How to leverage the blogosphere to enhance your company's message
• Strategies for taking advantage of this new medium
• The need for transparency and how to make it work for your benefit
• Action items for both small and large businesses
• Whether and how your organization should use blogs, podcasts and other social media tools in your marketing strategy

Cost: Members $40.00; Non-members $80.00
Signup form: http://function.masstlc.org/programs_new/event_single.cfm?eventid=808

Labels: blogging, influence, Paul_Gillin_speaking, social_media

  ¶ 10:45 AM 0 Comments Links to this post

  Corporate Blog Council should swallow hard and learn from critics

The newly formed Corporate Blog Council is getting slammed in the blogosphere this week. The council is a self-described “professional community of top global brands dedicated to promoting best practices in corporate blogging.” It includes some very large companies, although overall membership is small and skewed toward tech and media firms.

The blogosphere has been fairly merciless. Dave Taylor remarks, “My translation: ‘we're all clueless, but don't want anyone to realize just how unplugged our organizations have become from the world of ‘marketing 2.0’, so we created a club so our ignorance can be shielded from public eyes.’"

Scoble is skeptical, too: “I’ve done enough speaking to enough corporations now that if they don’t get why they should be talking with their customers already I don’t get how hanging out at yet another boring industry conference is going to help them to get it,” he says, pointedly.

Brian Solis says the focus on blogs shows that corporations still don’t get the concept of conversation. He asks if we’re also going to have a Viral Media Council, and a Conversation Council.

Marketing Pilgrim counts comments and finds that blogs run by the council members perform pretty dismally. She and several others point out that comments are disabled on the Blog Council’s site and that the council used a conventional press release to announce its existence.

Commenters are piling on, mostly trashing the whole Blog Council idea.

I hope the people that put their companies’ names on this initiative won’t be scared off by the thrashing they’re getting in the blogosphere. To veterans of the polite and deferential world of traditional corporate communications, this trash talk sounds juvenile and hateful, but it is really just the way people express their opinions in this medium. Conversations here are raw, blunt and sometimes offensive, but they are always genuine. You need a thick skin to play, but if you don’t take it personally, you can learn a lot.

Having worked with major corporations for many years, I’m inclined to be more generous to the Blog Council. Yes, everything the bloggers cited above have said is true, but the fact that these companies are taking action of any kind (and scheduling an event for next month, apparently) is significant. It probably took months just to get to the announcement phase.

Critics will say that that’s the problem: corporations have to water down and approve everything and that’s why they don’t get social media. That’s also true, but these companies have worked this way for a very long time. The fact that the world has changed around them in the last four years doesn’t mean they can respond in that timeframe. There are plenty of people within these companies advocating conversation marketing and meaningful change. They are being heard, but it takes a long time for voices to work their way up the hierarchy at big companies. And the people who head those companies are the least likely to understand what’s going on out there.

If the Blog Council is smart, it’ll ignore the tone and listen to the message. The blogosphere is delivering some important early feedback on the whole idea of the Blog Council. The members should listen, adjust and move incrementally forward. Bloggers can be quite blunt, but they can also be very forgiving. If the council demonstrates that it’s really serious about this venture, then the tone will turn supportive with remarkable speed.

Labels: blogging, corporate, marketing

  ¶ 8:21 AM 4 Comments Links to this post

  I make a top 100 list - at last! VirtualHosting.com has a new list of the Top 100 Social Media and Social Networking Blogs and Paul Gillin's blog is on it! I'm in the "developer" category, which seems an odd placement since my programming experience consists of one COBOL tutorial in the early 80s. But who's complaining? It's nice just to be on the list with a lot of people I respect. So thanks to VirtualHosting, "the authoritative resource online about retail virtual hosting plans." You're aces in my book! ;-)

Labels: blogging, social_media

  ¶ 2:02 PM 0 Comments Links to this post

  Coke to launch corporate blog The Coca-Cola Co. is just a few weeks away from launching a corporate blog, Adam Brown, Coke's Director of Digital Communications, told the Executing Social Media conference in Atlanta today. That would make Coke one of the few Fortune 100 companies (it's 94th) to enter the blogosphere. General Motors, at #3, has been blogging for three years.

Brown identified Coke's first blogger as Phil Moody, a 30-year employees who's responsible for the corporate archive. However, "We really want to get to an ensemble cast of bloggers where we can talk about not only our heritage, but also the environment, AIDS in Africa and other important issues," he said.

In taking that approach, Coke is adopting a tactic that's being practiced by an increasing number of corporations, including Southwest Airlines, Eastman-Kodak and Chrylser LLC. It spreads the work around and exposes the ideas of interesting individuals in a corporate venue.

Brown didn't identify the URL of the new blog. If anyone comes across it, please post the address here.

Labels: blogging, corporate

  ¶ 2:13 PM 1 Comments Links to this post

  Daily reading 11/10/2007

Managing a Corporate Blog, Like HP's - MetzMash

Wal-Mart's Biggest Marketing Tool? Its Web Site - MediaPost, Nov. 8, 2007

Top 10 Marketing Blogs – 2007/2008

ClickZ: Defining Social Media

Labels: blogging, marketing, social_media

  ¶ 8:30 AM 0 Comments Links to this post

  Marketing segmentation through social media Howard Kaushansky of Umbria gave an enlightening talk about audience segmentation of social media influencers at Blogworld Expo this morning. He talked about two examples of what his company has done for different clients in the consumer products field.

For an apparel maker, Umbria analyzed postings to blogs and social networks to identify the following segments:

Fit Finders (39% of the population), Self Expressives (19%), Bargain Seekers (17%), Label Whores (11%) , Style Gurus (8%) and Dissenters (6%).

Here’s an example of segment characteristics: Fit Finders are Generation Xers looking for appropriate jeans for their changing physiques. . Low-waisted jeans aren't working for them any more, but “old person jeans” aren't appealing either. Plus-sized Fit Finders are looking for fashion-forward styles rather than shapeless designs.

Self Expressives want control. They want to distress their own jeans, design clothing reconstructed from jeans and add personal style to jeans through patches and embroiders.

Style Gurus are looking to be unique. They're looking for authenticity and real inspiration. "Some men are actually starting to become interested in wearing women's jeans because they view them as more stylish," he said. These insights emerged from online conversations.

Umbria’s analysis is entirely text-based. “We're listening in on this world, not asking them to fill out surveys or segment themselves,” he said. It’s not just what people say but the words they use. Fifteen-year-old girls speak differently than 54-year-old men.”

For another client that makes packaged food, the company analyzed women’s blogs to identify four core segments: Me Time, Weight Management, Balance and Wellness and Beauty from Within (percentages weren’t given).

They then analyzed women’s needs and interests by time of day. The company also identified common moods at each time of the day and mapped foods, packaging and promotions to these moods and activities.

For example, afternoon is "Connect Time" when women share stories and experiences to gain support, external perspective, humor and advice. During Connect Time, activities include emailing, blogging, phone calls, sharing a meal, getting beauty treatments, going out, and spending time with family.

These segments were mapped to moods and foods. For example, "Me Time" is early morning, often before families are awake. At that time, women are looking to empower themselves. "Me O'Clock" yielded these strategic insights:

• Women embrace this time as an opportunity to regain control
• Don't tell them what's right; enable them to make better decisions and express themselves
• The emotional benefit of this time is personal empowerment

Ideas for productions and promotions:

• Personalized snacks
• Calendars with times blocked out for “Me Time.”
• Market teas and other products with a stimulative effect specific to early morning personal time.

With blog monitoring, "You can listen to these people and understand what are the drivers and unmet needs."

Labels: blogging, BlogWorldExpo, marketing, segmentation, social_media

  ¶ 2:45 PM 0 Comments Links to this post

  Last group of AMA Webinar questions answered Here is the final set of responses to questions that time didn't permit me to answer during the AMA Marketing Seminar on Oct. 15. Each of these permalinks is tagged “AMA” so you can easily group them together. Thanks again to everyone for coming and for asking such great questions.

Q: Chris asks, “Do you think this will impact corporate cultures? And how?”

That's a big question, but I'll try to summarize. One enormous impact of new media will be to force companies to be more open and transparent about their activities, motivations and mistakes. Once customers began talking to each other and sharing their experiences with your company, you have very little control over those conversations. It's going to be a lot harder to hide your blemishes and to keep secrets.

Already, many marketers are finding that their carefully managed product rollout plans are sabotaged by bloggers who get their hands on secret information. I believe that businesses, particularly large ones, are going to have to learn to live in a world where information can't be covered up very well. This will force them to be more transparent with their constituents about their plans. That won't be easy for everybody.

Internally, I expect social media to flatten corporate cultures. Communication within most companies has traditionally been controlled from the top down. But once individuals have the ability to speak freely with each other, those lines become much fuzzier. In most companies, this will be a good thing. However, a company that values a strict hierarchy will be challenged by this. They can refuse to give their employees blogs, but they can't prohibit their employees from communicating off-hours via blogs or social networks. Again, this won't be easy for everybody

Q: Viktor asks, “Will passionate social media users get paid at some point in time?

A: Many of them are getting paid now. For example, I spoke in my presentation about Adrants, which is a one-person operation that is generating good cash flow from advertising. Many models are being developed to reward bloggers for their hard work, although in reality very few people can make a living in this way. I expect that a small minority of people will be able to make decent income as new influencers, but only a very tiny number will become wealthy from it. These are niche markets, after all.

Q: S Law asks, “How do organizations and businesses engage bloggers to get that positive word of mouth?”

A: Much of my book is about this, so I'll refer you to that, or to other books I referenced earlier, including Naked Conversations by Scoble and Israel; Marketing to the Social Web by Weber; What No One Ever Tells You About Blogging and Podcasting by Demopoulos, The Corporate Blogging Book by Weil; and The New Rules of Marketing and PR by Scott.

To summarize, though, you need to take the following steps:

• Get to know which influencers matter in your market;
• Read or listen or watch what they've been publishing and learn what their passions and biases are;
• Engage in conversations about topics of mutual interest. Don't try to sell to them, though;
• Provide interesting and valuable information that they can use to further their interest and create new content for their sites;
• Invite them to become involved with your company as an adviser, reviewer and/or media representative;
• Show your gratitude. In most cases, this doesn't mean paying them so much as treating them as insiders and respected advisers. Although t-shirts are always welcome!

Q: Erika asks, “Have you looked at social influencers in the healthcare provider community? What is the prevalence there?”

A: It's very difficult to estimate numbers for any topic because of the large number of spam blogs. All the services try to filter out spam, but none succeeds very well.

Technorati lists nearly 5,000 blogs as being about medicine in some capacity and 2,000 as being about healthcare, although in reality the numbers are much smaller than that. There does appear to be quite a bit of healthcare information out there. For example, a Google blog search on “diabetes” turns up several thousand posts in the last day, and the top few hundred look legitimate.

In general, people use social media for topics that matter deeply to them, and there's no question that medicine is one of those areas. If you try searching the two sources I mentioned above, you'll pretty quickly get a picture of what's being said out there.

Q: Scott asks, “How do you weed out fake comments, possibly from the company or someone that is one-sided?”

A: Most blogging services offer the option to screen comments. This requires a little extra effort on your part, because you must go in and look at each comment individually before approving it, but this is necessary in some cases because comment spammers tend to send a lot of their trash to certain blogs.

There is no way to verify a person's identity when they post a comment, other than to verify e-mail addresses or search for their name. In general, you need to use common sense and make sure that comments don't betray a bias that could be driven by competitive issues.

I should stress, however, that you don't want to suppress legitimate comments just because they're negative. People expect to participate in the discussion, and as long as their words are reasonable and not profane, they should be allowed to do that. If you start censoring visitors, you will quickly hear from people about it, and often in public places. Don't get into blogging if you're not able to stand a little heat.

Labels: AMA, blogging, healthcare, marketing, PR, socialmedia, spam

  ¶ 4:24 PM 0 Comments Links to this post

  Still more AMA Webinar questions answered Here are more responses to questions that time didn't permit me to answer during the AMA Marketing Seminar on Oct. 15. Each of these permalinks is tagged “AMA” so you can easily group them together. Thanks to everyone for coming and for asking such great questions. More to come!

Q: Jodine asks “Another great example of this marketing approach is in the new music industry. Independent distributed musicians that gain their fans from MySpace and other social networks. Is this marketing approach what they call grassroots and/or organic marketing?”

A: That's certainly an appropriate term for it. MySpace, for example, has been a gold mine for independent music groups who don't have the marketing dollars to put into advertising. The idea is to create networks of friends who self-define their interests and share favorite bands among themselves. Also, people who produce podcasts and blogs devoted to music often make it a point to promote lesser-known groups. While these tactics so far haven't duplicated the throw weight of mainstream media campaigns, their popularity testifies to their effectiveness.

Q: Sanjay asks, “Are there any potential problems for a regional retailer with just a few locations?”

A: Not that I can think of. In fact, that person is a natural candidate for social media. Facebook, for example, is a great place to find people nearby who are interested in the products that the retailer sells. If I was a camera store owner in Chicago, for example, I might set up a Facebook group for photography enthusiasts to discuss their favorite Chicagoland sites to photograph. You can use that as a jumping off point to create events and even more targeted groups.

A blog is also a terrific way to showcase expertise, and if you're careful to label the blog and its posts with regional tags, you'll do better on search engines. For small businesses on a budget, social media is a godsend.

Q: Kristin asks, “How will the change in social media affect crisis communications?”

A: I can think of a couple of major ways. For better or worse, people are increasingly taking their gripes and frustrations to their blogs instead of going through customer service channels. This makes the blogosphere an excellent early warning system. You should have Google Alerts set up for every product and brand you own, and you should also create RSS feeds from sites like Technorati, BlogPulse and IceRocket that can alert you immediately to new topics of blog chatter.

In terms of responding to a crisis, a blog is perhaps the fastest way to get information online. This bypasses the media gatekeepers and insurers that the message is coming directly from you. If you link aggressively to the blog from your website and from blogs maintained by your employees and outside constituents, you can build visibility very quickly. Sites like Twitter are also increasingly being used by marketers to get messages out to the public instantly.

Q: Viktor asks “What's your opinion on intellectual property rights
with blogging?”

A: There effectively are none, and this is a huge hairball for new media. The reality is that many people who are now publishing online could care less about intellectual property or copyright. I have had entire articles lifted verbatim from my blog and even mainstream media sites and republished without any attribution whatsoever. It's not worth going after people legally in most cases, and that tactic can actually create unwanted publicity.

The entertainment companies have led the charge in trying to bring some order to this intellectual-property chaos, but they have encountered a lot of resistance and their tactics have not always been diplomatic. They have done themselves few favors. I'm afraid that these issues will take years to hammer out, and that our notions of copyright may look very different a few years from now. I wish I could be more encouraging, but a lot of people are wrestling with this problem.

Labels: AMA, blogging, crisiscommunications, facebook, marketing, myspace, PR, socialmedia, socialnetworks, twitter

  ¶ 12:50 PM 0 Comments Links to this post

  More AMA Webinar questions answered Here are more responses to questions that time didn't permit me to answer during the AMA Marketing Seminar on Oct. 15. Each of these permalinks is tagged “AMA” so you can easily group them together. Thanks to everyone for coming and for asking such great questions. More to come!

Q: Stacie asks, “How will social media play out with healthcare vs. consumer products?”

A: Very differently. People typically want to consult with expert advisers on healthcare decisions and their relationships with those people are important. They’re much less likely to turn to anonymous sources for life-and-death matters. That said, the Internet has played and will continue to play an important role in alternative medicine, wellness and background research. Social media will have an important role in helping people diagnose problems, choose courses of treatment and seek alternatives.

In consumer products, social media is already playing a huge role in evaluation and purchase activity. The CEO of Procter & Gamble told the Association of National Advertisers last year that they have to stop trying to control the message. "Consumers are more participative and selective and the trend from push to pull is accelerating," he said. Those are strong words coming from the world’s largest consumer products company.

Q: Anne asks, ”Doesn't social networking skew younger? And, do these networks apply to B2B marketers?”

A: Yes, the most active users of social networks are unquestionably people under the age of 30. If you’re an entertainment, food or clothing company, you’re probably already using these media because that’s where your audience is.

In some markets, though, social media is making a big impact on older age groups, and particularly in b-to-b markets. The information technology market is one of the most active users of blogs and podcasts, for example, and it’s almost entirely a b-to-b business. The travel and hospitality industry is using interactive marketing to reach business people with specific interests, such as frequent travelers and corporate event planners. Professional associations like the Air Conditioning Contractors of America and the National Association of Manufacturers are blogging to promote their members. There will be more examples of this as the younger population grows up and begins to apply the tools they use at home to their business roles.

Q: Patience asks “So why did you choose to not self-publish?”

A: I believe this question is in response to a comment I made about Lulu.com and similar sites that making self-publishing of books fast and relatively inexpensive. There are advantages to working with a commercial publisher, including an established distribution network, retail store presence and a certain cachet that comes from having a publisher endorse your work. This leads to intangible business opportunities that have nothing to do with royalties. You can definitely make more money self-publishing, though. If you don’t particularly care about building a speaking or consulting business, but just want to get a message out, self-publishing gives you more control and potentially bigger profits.

Q: Brent asks, “Are there similar influencers in Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America?”

A: Yes, although to different degrees. In fact, the number one language in the blogosphere is Japanese, according to Technorati’s State of the Live Web report. Korea and Japan have a much higher penetration of broadband into the home than the U.S. does, and a very active culture of bloggers and social networkers as a result. Korea’s OhMyNews.com is the largest experiment in community journalism on the Internet.

In Europe, the blogosphere is very healthy, although my evidence is purely anecdotal. I run across blogs in Danish, German, French and other languages I don’t even recognize all the time. Two of the most interesting corporate blogs are published by Benetton and Ducati motorcycles, both in Italy.

I can’t speak to Latin-America specifically. The economy is not as strong in many of those countries as in the U.S., Europe and the Pacific Rim, so broadband penetration is lower. The Technorati blog tracks blogs by language and can give you some useful statistics.

Q: Anne asks, “How do apply this to local or regional marketing? Yelp, for instance is very biased, and doesn't feel trustworthy the way that a more neutral, traditional third party does.”

A: I’m not sure I agree with your comments about Yelp. That site is simply a conduit for its members to post reviews of restaurants and entertainment spots. While such a system is always vulnerable to manipulation, the number of reviews that Yelp lists for some properties is remarkable. In general, the more reviews there are, the more reliable the average rating should be.

You should always be leery of peer-review systems in which only a few people have commented. It’s like research: you should probably through out the extremes at both ends of the scale, because those people may have an agenda.

As far as regional marketing goes, I’d just point out that some of the most active social networks are regional. Going.com, Yelp and eCrush are just three of the many networks that target people who are looking for entertainment and companionship. Also, regional interests like sports and politics are magnets for local audiences.

Labels: AMA, blogging, social_media, socialnetworks

  ¶ 8:32 AM 0 Comments Links to this post

  New England bloggers talk shop I walked in late to a session on business blogging hosted by blogger and Boston Globe columnist Scott Kirsner. Panelists were:

	Don Dodge, Director of Business Development, Microsoft Emerging Business Team, and blogger;
	Barbara Heffner, partner at CHEN PR and blogger
	Nabeel Hyatt, CEO at Conduit Labs and blogger
	Bijan Sabet, venture capitalist at Spark Capital and blogger,
	Jimmy Guterman, Editor of Release 2.0 and blogger, O'Reilly Radar
	Scott Kirsner, Boston Globe "Innovation Economy" columnist and blogger
	Chuck Tanowitz, director, Schwartz Communications and blogger

Here are my rather stream-of-consciousness notes on the discussion

Kirsner asks: "Why do you blog?"

Responses include:
Hyatt: It fills the space between press releases
Sabet: Great way to communicate with colleagues across the country
Hyatt: We have 10 employees nd four of them blog. We have internal editors go over all the entries. It may sound weird, but my opinion is that anyone who's writing for the NY Times is writing on behalf of the NY Times. We want anything we release to be collective.

Kirsner says (jokingly) that the Globe probably hasn't noticed his blog yet. I didn't want to wait six months to start writing it. To have the Globe logo on the blog has issues of oversight and I don't want that. I think I have the same standards for the blog as for the column, but there are things you can post there that you can't put in the column. In other words, he applies journalistic standards, but is a little freer about language on the blog.

Jimmy Guterman notes that Kirsner's blog voice is more engaging than his Globe voice. One of the appealing things about corporate blogs is that they better reflect the voice of the writer.

Don Dodge says 60% of his traffic comes from Google. He could write what he writes on a corporate website and wouldn't get anywhere near that traffic. "For anyone starting a company, I would highly recommend that you blog. You will get far more juice from that than from having a company website."

Dodge worked at Alta Vista at one point and knows about search. Some blogs get searched every hour and some get indexed once a week or once a month. Frequency of update relates to search engine performance (something I was unaware of).

Barb Heffner says her agency treats bloggers generally as they do other journalists.

Kirsner asks who's more powerful: TechCrunch or the WSJ? Barb says Journal is an enterprise sell and TechCrunch is a consumer sell. Both powerful in their own way.

Audience member notes that you should read the blog before sending an e-mail to a blogger. "It's extraordinary the number of e-mails I get who haven't read my blog. From that perspective, there's no difference between a journalist and a blogger." Heffner says good PR practices apply equally in the blogosphere.

Don Dodge tells of bumping into Robert Scoble, who had two suggestions: put your name in the title and put your picture on the blog. "Those two things made an amazing difference. If your picture isn't there, you can walk down the halls and no one will know who you are. If your picture is there, everyone knows who you are."

Bijan Sabet says one of his favorite blogs is Flickr. Every now and then he wants to quick Flickr, but the genuineness of the blog keeps him coming back. He says he just invested in a company where the founder decided not to use PR but to use a blog instead. They wrote all their entries last week and were ready to go, but the bloggers picked it up before the embargo ended. "we've had a fair share of press releases that have gone out on the wire and I don't see much return from that. We had one investment company get picked up on Engadget and got a 14:1 return versus a mention on TechCrunch."

Barb Heffner warns against ghost-writing CEO blogs.

Nabeel notes that a lot of technologists aren't great writers, and that's why they need some oversight and editing. We've got people who are great and passionate in front of an audience, but when he sits down to write, he's pretty timid."

Dan Bricklin notes that not everybody writes well, but maybe they should be doing podcasts. That's part of the job of marketing and PR people: figure out what's the best way to get the message across. He cites a great podcast by the head of the US Navy. If you listened to it, you wouldn't be surprised by what he said to the press.

Scott Kirsner asks how metrics-obsessed people are...

Author of 93South blog says he bought an iPhone so he could check his traffic while driving. "I used to check two or three times a day, but I've learned over the past six months to let go because I'm not doing it for traffic. I'm doing it to speak."

Guterman notes that metrics are misleading. They tell you different things. "It's as misleading as an author who writes a book and then starts checking his Amazon ranking 30 times a day. There's a lot of talk about authenticity, but people confusing authenticity with spontaneity. Don't think of a blog as a way to get around having to think about what you're writing."

Audience member George Jenkins writes a blog about identity theft. "I write because I'm passionate about the subject. I've had a lot of fun meeting people through the blog. I know that people from IBM visit my site (he worked at IBM at one time) but they're reluctant to comment."

Scott Kirsner tells of an executive taking him to task for something he said on the blog. He spoke to the exec on the phone and recommended the guy comment on the blog but it was clear that the exec was uncomfortable doing that.

Bijan says he has a Technorati addiction. "Blogging software is still one-way, it's not two-way enough. We need to surface links from one blog to another."

An audience member from Sphere asks whether people are using widgets to drive traffic.
Bijan says widgets are useful for driving traffic. "I'll put them on my site for a while to see if people are engaging with them."

Nabeel Hyatt says that when his company recently did A-round funding, they posted on a blog instead of issuing a press release. "We saw a ton of traffic, and by watching the inbound link, we learned of small competitors we had never seen before. Perhaps they thought no one was watching, but I was." He says he's addicted to MyBlogLog for its widget that tells who's coming to the site. There's about a 5% higher return rate from visitors who like to see their faces there.

Bijan says he's seeing 3-4% CTR from Feedburner. He signed up to be an Amazon affiliate, so he does a lot of geeky product reviews (gives the money to charity). That leads to a few good-sized transactions every month.

A discussion ensues about taking gifts from businesses, quid pro quo and disclosure. Don Dodge tells of meeting Patriots owner Bob Kraft at a conference, ending up with free tickets to a Patriots game and still writing a critical article about the Patriots.

Guterman says disclosure isn't enough. Just revealing your affiliations doesn't excuse extreme bias. You can't assume people notice your disclosures. Don't let yourself be influenced and don't take the graft.

Sabet notes that people come to his blog to read about the companies he's funding and he sees no problem with promoting those companies. "You have to give the reader credit. The reader isn't assuming that the venture capitalist isn't biased."

Discussion turns to most popular topics. Don Dodge notes that one of his most popular was about 1% of the search market being worth $1 billion. But the number one post of all time was a reference to a porn video site. "I know how to get a lot of traffic if I wanted to, but I don't do it for that reason." Traffic alone isn't that important to him.

Dan Bricklin says some things lend themselves to video. He went to see Vern Rayburn, who's got a factory that makes jets. "The only way to really show people was to take the video and let people hear Vern's voice. Sometimes the short, two-minute form is what you need." Kirsner says it's hard to drive traffic to Internet video.

Dodge says we've been conditioned to professional standards by TV. Your standards are high. Most people who try to do video on a blog stink compared to TV.

Kirsner says the most watched video on YouTube is Evolution of Dance, which was filmed by an amateur and looks it.

Dodge says he tried to convince Robert Scoble not to go to video. He's a great blogger, but when he went to video, his traffic fell to 10%.

Labels: blogculture, blogging, ScottKirsner

  ¶ 6:33 PM 2 Comments Links to this post

  Your questions answered: AMA webinar follow-up I had the pleasure of being the guest speaker on and American Marketing Association webinar sponsored by Aquent early this week. We had a great audience -- more than 750 people attended -- and there were more than 20 questions that I was unable to answer because of time limitations. I'll answer each of them in a series of blog posts over the next few days. Each of these permalinks will be tagged “AMA” so you can easily group them together. Thanks to everyone for coming and for asking such great questions.

Q: [At one point, I referred to a story told by blogger Robert Scoble about a technology vendor who told him that a single link on his blog drew far more response than an article in a prominent technology magazine.] Jennifer asks, “How did the software company evaluate the influence of Scoble's blog?”

A: Simply by traffic to the page linked to by Scoble. This is one of the great benefits of social media marketing: you can easily track referring links from other sites and quickly figure out who is sending you traffic. This is standard information that all Web analytics software provides. Obviously, the people who are sending you the most traffic are the people who should get more of your attention and outreach.

Q: Lidia asks, “I would like to know your opinion related to the large influence this phenomena is having on small kids that are exposed to these new media sites like clubpenguin, etc. How will these affect their personality, their habits, etc?

A: I'm not a psychologist, and it's impossible to predict the indirect impact of the behaviors that social media sites are creating. I believe that a few changes are inevitable:

• Kids will define their relationships very differently, with geography being much less important than in the past. They are already learning to form rich and meaningful relationships with people they have never met, solely through the use of digital technology. They care little about where their friends live as long as they can communicate about topics of mutual interest. If you take this to its logical conclusion, you can see that national boundaries will become less important to relationships in the future. It seems to me that that's a good thing.
• Kids will grow up expecting to be constantly connected and to always have information at their fingertips. Call it the Wikipedia generation. This is completely different from the world of previous generations. Today’s kids will expect to be able to access whatever information they want within a few seconds, and will be frustrated and angry when it’s unavailable. This will put pressure on institutions to open up and give people access to whatever information they need to make a decision. Again, this sounds pretty good to me.
• There's a possibility the kids will grow up being less worldly and less well-rounded than generations that preceded them because of their ability to filter information they consume. I'm hoping that natural curiosity counteracts this trend, but the declining influence of mainstream media may create a generation that is more insular and less aware of world issues than previous generations.
• There's a risk of negative health consequences caused by a more sedentary lifestyle. There's no question in my mind that the current epidemic of childhood obesity is due, at least in part, to the pervasive use of video games and online entertainment instead of physical recreation. It will be up to parents, schools and government to encourage physical activity by kids who don't have as much incentive to get out and play anymore. I don't think we're seeing as much progress in this area as we need to, and it concerns me.

I'm sure there will be many other long-term effects of this new digital lifestyle, some good and some bad. I think the breaking down of cultural and geographic barriers, though, will be a very positive development.

Q: Charlayne asks, “How does a company build "blog" integrity without sounding as if they are their own advertisement? How does a company build positive brand awareness via a blog?”

A: I’ll answer the first part of that question by simply saying don't use your blog to sell. The purpose of a business blog should be to engage with customers and prospects around information that is of mutual interest. Use it to expose smart people in your company, discuss issues in the market, identify customer needs and seek feedback on your products and priorities. Don’t use it to deliver advertisements; if you do, no one will read it and you will quickly lose interest yourself.

The second question is very large and could be the subject of a book. In fact, it is the subject of several books. I’d recommend Naked Conversations by Scoble and Israel; Marketing to the Social Web by Weber; What No One Ever Tells You About Blogging and Podcasting by Demopoulos, The Corporate Blogging Book by Weil; and The New Rules of Marketing and PR by Scott. It’s impossible to summarize the advice contained in all of these volumes, so I will simply recommend that you pick any one of them and dive in.

Labels: AMA, blogging, social_media, socialnetworks

  ¶ 2:47 PM 0 Comments Links to this post

  Miller's Brew Blog covers the competition I came across the Miller Brew Blog for the first time today, although it's been up since early this year. While my first reaction was that it's a lot of dry press releases and reprints from Miller's corporate magazine (and a lot of it reads that way), the about page revealed that it's written by a veteran advertising reporter and is intended to be a roundup of news and commentary about the brewing industry.

On that point, the Brew Blog succeeds. A lot of the content is about Miller's competition and the changes going on in the overall industry. There's a lot about arch-rival Annheuser-Busch, for example. What's missing is commentary. While the blog succeeds in talking openly about issues that aren't usually discussed in corporate communications, it fails to deliver much spirit, attitude or even a distinctive personality.

Labels: blogging, businessblog, corporate

  ¶ 6:10 AM 0 Comments Links to this post

  I'm on the radio in Atlanta this Thursday If you're in the Atlanta area (or have access to a Web browser!), listen in on Business Radio 1160 this Thursday at 11 for my interview with Brent Leary and Michael Thomas, who are two fun guys. Or you can download the podcast version right now. Here's the synopsis:

How You and Your Small Business Can Become a New Influencer - Paul talks with hosts Brent Leary and Michael Thomas about how he utilized his blog to enlist hundreds of collaborators to help him write his book, what it takes to be a new influencer and a few examples of how small businesses are using social media to positively influence their bottom lines.

Labels: blogging, Paul_Gillin_quoted, smallbusiness

  ¶ 8:42 AM 0 Comments Links to this post

  Blogging your book to the top I've had many inquiries about the role of blogging in book promotion. As regular visitors know, I posted the chapters of The New Influencers online for several months and asked for comments and feedback. The strategy was successful not only for improving the quality of the content but also for building advanced awareness that has translated into reviews in the blogosphere.

Now a group of authors and PR people have put together Blog Your Book to the Top, an e-book about successful blog strategies for book promotion. It costs $29.95 and it looks to have some decent first-hand advice and case studies from successful authors.

Full disclosure: I'm quoted in several places in this book, but I don't get any royalties for it. I'm mentioning this only because other authors may find this advice to be valuable.

Labels: blogging, books

  ¶ 7:52 AM 0 Comments Links to this post

  Q&A for PRSA

I was privileged to present a virtual seminar this week to the Public Relations Society of America. Some interesting questions came into my mailbox after the program was over, so I thought I'd answer them here.

If you're at the PRSA International Conference in October, be sure to stop by and say hello. I'll be giving a presentation on Monday, Oct. 22, as well as sharing the stage with PR legend Larry Weber.

Here are the questions and my responses:

Sarah writes:

I am interested in the standards of new media and wanted to ask you specifically about the emergence of advertising on the new media platforms. Are advertisers gaining traction on these sites? I imagine they are. So then…will the new media have a mechanism for separating edit from ads? More fundamentally, how do I trust that the blogger-citizen-writer is free from advertiser influence?

One phenomenon I discuss in my book is the emergence of a rich set of ethical standards in the blogosphere, the kind of standards that any journalistic organization would be proud of. Basically, deception is considered a high crime, and bloggers who have written for hire have been roundly flogged. There are services that pay for coverage, but as a rule, bloggers are expected to disclose these affiliations.

The question of separating ads from editorial is always a moving target, as it has been in print for many years. I believe advertisers and publishers both know that disguising advertising as editorial is bad news. Standards for how ads appear on a page are evolving, but our perceptions will evolve with them. Just as avid newspaper readers instinctively know how to tell an editorial from an advertorial, I expect the same intuitions will develop online.

Jason comments:
While Facebook is exploding beyond [its origins as a service for students], the core users still base their involvement on personal networks. The majority of my Facebook friends are former students I worked with while a PR manager in academia. Integrating these less than professional interactions with fellow PR pros and even clients makes for pins and needles monitoring.

No matter how many identities you might have, Google ruins your chances of complete separation. Unless you resort to pseudonyms for your interactions, the transparent society in which we surf will forever dangle the threat of exposure if you like to keep your person and persona separate.

Can an executive at, say, Ford, share beer jokes with college buddies on his or her MySpace page? Or manage a personal blog about erotic photography while representing Ford on the company blog?

My questions are:

1. Do you see potential pitfalls of people juggling multiple identities in the online world?
2. Where should professionals draw the line in becoming a social networking participant on a personal basis?
3. HR professionals are already Googling potential job candidates. Should your Facebook/MySpace/etc., profiles be off-limits and how can they be if the information is there and free? 4. How long will it take for the Supreme Court to have to decide what a person's online world means in terms of their employment?
4. How long will it take for the Supreme Court to have to decide what a person's online world means in terms of their employment?

Your questions imply that people should expect protection over what they say in a public forum beyond those already afforded by the Constitution. I fundamentally disagree with that. The public Internet is every bit as much a public space as Times Square, the exceptions being that one's indiscretions on the Internet may potentially be seen by many more people and may also be easily searched, copied and stored. It's no secret that the Internet is a public resource or that public websites are, well, public. I think it's foolhardy to assume that what you say on the Internet is private.

This puts a greater burden on the individual to be aware of the risks of their behavior and to be discreet. Personally, I would never say anything on a public website that I wouldn’t want published in a newspaper. But the burden is with individual, not with those who witness a person’s behavior. If you want privacy, pick up the phone, use an anonymous e-mail server or encrypt your messages. But don't expect the courts to come to your rescue. Ignorance of the law is not an excuse for breaking the law, and failing to understand the obvious risks of speaking in a public place should not be an excuse for doing something stupid.

Cindy asks:
When I returned to the office, I immediately tried to go onto Technorati and search for bloggers in the mortgage technology arena, where many of my clients are focused. I found many mentions of mortgage and technology but could not figure out if [the authors] were influential or if they focused in the industry. Is there a better way to go about finding these bloggers? I think I may be too old for this stuff.

I doubt you're too old, Cindy! It's more a matter of the search tools being different in this world. I’ll preface my response by saying that all search tools are imperfect. You should use these resources only to give you a general idea of a blogger’s influence.

When you look at the search results in Technorati, you'll notice a small green label that says "Authority." This is a ranking that Technorati uses to distinguish the popularity of bloggers. The higher that number, the more links to the bloggers site and, supposedly, the greater the person's authority. Click on the name of a blogger to see a more complete profile of that person, including his or her ranking among all the blogs that Technorati tracks.

Blogpulse is another site to look at. You can search on a term and then click the "view blog profile" link on the right to learn more about the author. Blogpulse's database is smaller than Technorati's, but it has some interesting and unique features.

Here are a couple of Google tricks. When you type a search term, look at the URLs of the sites in the results. You can often tell by the domain name whether a site is owned by an individual or a business. If a site looks interesting, type “site:sitename.com” into Google to get a list of sites that link to that one. The more links there are, the more popular the site.

You can also use the “site:” operator to find all mentions of a particular search term on a site. So typing “social media site:paulgillin.com” will return a list of all articles on paulgillin.com that mention social media. This is a good way to find out how much a blogger refers to a topic.

Labels: blogging, CIO PR, social_media

  ¶ 7:53 PM 15 Comments Links to this post

  The Mass. Registry of Motor Vehicles blogs - badly

I went online today to learn about renewing my drivers license and was amused to discover that the Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles has a ”blog.” I use quotation marks because the website violates nearly every rule of good blogging:

• There have been only five entries in the last 18 months and only one in the last five months.
• There is only one link in the most recent entry, and it’s to a press release.
• There are no tags, comments, blogroll or RSS feed. The lack of comments is a shame because the latest topic – widespread abuse of handicapped parking medallions – seems like something a lot of people would want to talk about.
  
• There is no distinctive look or feel. The “blog” is dropped in on the home page like a press release.

To give credit where credit is due, the Registry should be commended for even experimenting with a blog, given that government agencies aren't inclined to live on the edge. Also, the Registrar does make an effort to bring some personality to her writing, though her comments lack passion. I have to wonder if her posts are approved by the press office before publishing.

All in all, this effort s a good example of why some organizations should avoid the blogosphere.

Labels: blogging, corporate

  ¶ 12:38 PM 0 Comments Links to this post

  Tech PR War Stories 18: CEO bloggers are great except when they're not

Labels: blogging, socialnetworks

  ¶ 1:50 PM 1 Comments Links to this post

  WSJ's blogging retrospective is interesting reading The Wall Street Journal celebrates the 10th anniversary of blogging (can you believe it?) with a series of essays from prominent media and literary figures about the role and value of blogs. They range from Tom Wolfe's dismissal of the medium as a "universe of rumors" to Elizabeth Spiers' thoughtful essay on the value of targeted audiences. It's an eclectic and interesting selection of contributors representing a wide range of perspective. Recommended reading.

Labels: blogging

  ¶ 8:24 AM 1 Comments Links to this post

  My interview on Blog Talk Radio

I’ve done lots of radio interviews over the years, and they are invariably similar: the host has maybe three to five minutes to talk and asks a question every 30 seconds or so. You can't slow down because the listener's attention will wane and will switch to another station. It’s invigorating, but also ultimately frustrating because it's so hard to say much that’s meaningful in that short a period of time.

That's why my interview this week on Blog Talk Radio was such a pleasant surprise. Just minutes before going on the air, host Wayne Hurlbert informed me that the program lasted a full hour with no commercial breaks. This is like telling someone in a Porsche that they have the entire highway to themselves. It was such a pleasure to stretch out and really talk over some of the issues with Wayne, who asked excellent questions. I don't know if anyone has the stomach to listen to me for an hour, but if you want to hear more details about what I learned about social media while writing The New Influencers, give it a listen.

Labels: blogging, podcast, social_media

  ¶ 3:27 PM 4 Comments Links to this post

  Tech PR War Stories 14: Are CMP layoffs the death knell for IT print media? This week in the Tech PR War Stories podcast, David and I reflect on upheaval at CMP, which laid off 20% of its workforce last week and shuttered some print publications. I suggest that this is the beginning of the end of print publishing in the IT media market and note that the economics of online publishing in that area are now weighted toward using freelance and blogger contributors instead of full-time staff.

Labels: blogging, mainstream_media, podcast, PR, Web_2.0

  ¶ 11:42 AM 0 Comments Links to this post

  Dell attack-dog tactics backfire in the blogosphere

A story has been playing out at Dell Computer this week that illustrates vividly the clash of cultures that must be going on in many companies over blogging.

Last Thursday, Consumerist.com posted a list of tips submitted by a former Dell sales manager that told, among other things, how to get the best deals and even get a free laptop replacement at the end of a warranty cycle. This kind of stuff is Consumerist’s bread and butter - and Dell one of its favorite targets - so the site gleefully ran the secrets, along with commentary from a current Dell rep.

Dell must have been ripped, but it then threw gasoline on the fire. On Friday, Dell sent a corporate lawyer after Consumerist with a cease-and-desist notice. What a boneheaded maneuver that was. Naturally, Consumerist posted the lawyer’s threat along with a response. The exchange made the Dell lawyer looked clueless, particularly since she never disputed the accuracy of the Consumerist information.

Meanwhile, readers were having a field day. Along with more than 300,000 page views, the Consumerist story on was dugg more than 3,600 times, making it one of the most popular technology news items of the last week. In trying to bury the offending item, Dell actually created a magnet of publicity

On Saturday, Dell’s Lionel Menchaca posted a thoughtful and somewhat extraordinary account of the whole incident on the Direct2Dell blog. He admitted that Dell had dropped the ball and should never have asked for the information on Consumerist to be taken down in the first place. He also addressed many of the flaws in Dell's pricing, promotion and support system highlighted by the original post. What was extraordinary was the links to photos on Engadget of unannounced Dell products. People used to get fired for leaking news like that. Now they link to it on the company blog!

Needless to say, commenters have been all over this story. Consumerist comes out smelling like a rose, and it should because it published accurate, useful stuff. You have to wonder what kind of troglodyte at Dell thought it was a good idea to sic the corporate lawyer on Consumerist. In the professional media world, these kinds of disputes take place in the background and outside of the view of the reader. There is no such discretion in the blogosphere; in fact, many bloggers actually rejoice in tweaking the noses of those whom they offend.

The contrast between the corporate lawyer’s truculence and the corporate blogger’s openness are really a microcosm of what many organizations must be dealing with right now. There’s a command-and-control side of Dell’s business that attempted to apply decade-old containment strategies to a medium that simply laughed in its face. At the same time, you can see in the Direct2Dell experiment that a culture is emerging at the company that values a new form of interaction. You just wonder why the lawyer never asked the blogger for advice before going on the offensive.

Labels: blogging, social_media influence, transparency, Web_2.0

  ¶ 2:32 PM 1 Comments Links to this post

  Tech PR War Stories Episode 11: our guest is Sam Whitmore Sam Whitmore's Media Survey is one of the most influential publications in the high-tech PR community, and David Strom and I were fortunate to have Sam himself as a guest on Tech PR War Stories this week.

We asked Sam to talk about the up-and-coming influencers in IT media and his response surprised me. He's evidently looking at media that tap into the real issues that IT pros wrestle with week-to-week more than new publishers and editors. He also had a lot to say about the ethos of the blogosphere and how PR pros should work with this new class of journalist. Bottom line: deal with it. These are the new journalists and their ethics and practices aren't all that different from the folks you've dealt with for years.

Good stuff from a thought leader who pulls no punches.

Labels: blogging, journalism, podcast, PR, social_media

  ¶ 9:14 PM 0 Comments Links to this post

  Who's got time to read fiction? The always provocative Michael Fitzgerald (he writes the Prototype column for The New York Times and is a friend and colleague from way back) blogged recently about declining reader interest in fiction and suggests that perhaps nonfiction is becoming a more appealing alternative to fiction because it's so real.

It's a good point, but I'd suggest that there's another factor at play. People simply don't have time to curl up with a good book any more. We're so assaulted by the demand to keep up with what all the new voices are saying that we no longer have the leisure to kick back and read for pleasure like we used to. I see this in my own experience: right now I have a backlog of 80 or 90 articles in mainstream and social media that I believe I need to read to keep up with my area of expertise. I don't see any air in my schedule for a good Stephen King novel any more. There are 15 million new voices in the blogosphere writing daily and I'm concerned that if I don't keep up with them I'll fall behind.

I suspect that a lot of people are feeling the same pressure and that reading for pleasure - a pursuit that I value and still hope to embrace - may suffer as a result.

Labels: blogging

  ¶ 10:03 PM 1 Comments Links to this post

  More nice words in the blogosphere Thanks to Renee Blodgett for her kind words about New Influencers. She admits she hasn't read it yet, but expects it to be great. Now those are the kinds of critics I like!

The prolific Rob Enderle also said some very nice things about the book in his TechNews World column, which is widely syndicated. My thanks to him, also.

I have to admit to having developed a fascination with the Amazon sales ranking over the last couple of weeks particularly as New Influencers has moved into the top 10,000. I tend to check it every few hours and my mood can vary according to whether it's up or down.

I guess my mood varies a lot, because the book has run the gamut from 1,500 to 70,000 in just the last week. Its rank can easily move 30,000 places in a day. I looked around for an explanation of how the ranking works and found an interesting one on Web Pro News, but the bottom line is that it's Amazon's little secret and no one outside of that company really has a clue.

Perhaps more importantly, no one has figured out a direct correlation between the sales ranking and actual book sales. Perhaps this is why my publisher refuses to pay any attention to it. And I try to ignore it. I can quit whenever I want. Really.

Labels: blogging, NewInfluencers

  ¶ 5:39 AM 2 Comments Links to this post

  The New Influencers in the Merc The San Jose Mercury News' Dean Takahashi devotes a column to The New Influencers today. Takahashi, who's reported for The Wall Street Journal among other journals, touches on several key points from the book and notes that a former colleague of his, Peter Rojas, went on to become a millionaire and a poster child of blogging success. He asks playfully (and a bit ruefully) if there's still time for him to become a new influencer with his popular gaming blog.

Dean took the time to speak to me at some length on Monday evening. He also read the entire book, a fact that is both flattering and impressive in this continuously distracted world. It's a thrill to be cited in such an important newspaper and by a reporter whose work I respect so much.

Labels: blogging, journalism, NewInfluencers

  ¶ 6:03 AM 1 Comments Links to this post

  Recommended reading If you visit the Amazon page for The New Influencers, you'll probably find that the Amazon recommendation engine pairs the book with the latest from David Meerman Scott: The New Rules of Marketing and PR. I've just finished David's book (his third) and highly recommend it.

David's premise is that marketing and PR have been forever changed by the Internet and that marketers who continue to mine traditional channels of influence are missing the boat. He argues persuasively that the new opportunity is to speak directly to customers - without going through intermediaries - and to engage them in mutually satisfying conversations that lead to long-term relationships.

This is the same basic premise of my book, only I focused exclusively on social media tools. David takes more of a macro approach, incorporating press releases, websites and fundamentals of good marketing. The last third of the book is full of useful how-to information, ranging from basics of tagging and podcasting to some excellent advice on how to write for your customers.

The new world of marketing is scary to a lot of people, but that's because change is scary. In The New Rules, David Meerman Scott outlines an exciting and opportunity-filled landscape that should energize every marketer. You need to read this book.

Labels: blogging, marketing, social_media, viral_marketing

  ¶ 6:29 AM 0 Comments Links to this post

  Bloggers get a magazine of their very own

Blogger & Podcaster magazine has launched simultaneously in print, online and as a podcast. Give credit for creativity coming up with that three-pronged launch plan. I actually used to work with the editor, Anne Saita, but I don't know anyone else on the masthead.

One thing you can count on in technology is that publishers will quickly jump on a new trend and launch a magazine for it. The big thing this book appears to have going for it is that its audience has a defined set of interests. That’s important, since magazines that are specific to a single technology tend not to last very long. But I wonder about the business model. Not many vendors sell products specifically to bloggers/podcasters and the target readers tend to find tools of the trade for free where they can. They don’t have big budgets. Also, while bloggers/podcasters have a medium in common, they don’t share much else. The similarities between me and the guy who writes Daily Kos are few.

On first look, I can't see much reason why this magazine should last very long, but I give credit to the publisher for giving it a try. You never know when you might hit it big.

Labels: blogging, mainstream_media

  ¶ 8:10 PM 0 Comments Links to this post

  Come hear David Weinberger's social media insights on April 24. It's free!

Last month, I wrote from the New Communications Forum in Las Vegas about a great keynote presentation by David Weinberger. Now here's a treat: if you are in the New England area, you can hear David speak about the changes that social media are already causing in markets and institutions and all it’ll cost you is a drive to Waltham, MA.

As a co-author of Cluetrain Manifesto, David is one of the fathers of Web 2.0 and he is on the leading edge of thinking about it. His insights about why people blog, podcast and contribute to Wikipedia will amaze and delight you.

Join us on April 24 in Waltham from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. to hear his thoughts. It's a free service of the Massachusetts Technology Leadership Council. All you have to do is write “guest of Paul Gillin” in the additional registrant’s field.

All the details are here.

Labels: blogging, social_media

  ¶ 1:06 PM 0 Comments Links to this post

  Reflections on Day 1 of SXSW

Click To Play

Labels: blogging, social_media, sxsw

  ¶ 10:56 PM 0 Comments Links to this post

  Weinberger NCF keynote: users take back power Popular blogger and Cluetrain Manifesto co-author David Weinberger gave an enlightening and funny keynote presentation to the New Communications Forum in Las Vegas this morning. Here are my notes:

For the last 100 years, broadcast has dominated our communications and our democracy. Broadcast is now being put in its place. Many-to-many communications will become more important than broadcast.

It’s not about the content. We’re able to get past broadcast because we’re able to escape reality. Broadcast works because it’s constrained by the limitations of reality.

You can’t be in two places at the time, so everything has to have its own place. It’s a terrible limitation that the digital world escapes.

In mainstream media, there’s a limited amount of space. So only a few things get to appear and only a few people get to right. It’s the same order of information for everyone. Take away those constraints and now everybody can talk. We decide what’s interesting to us.

The authority system is changing. This goes back to the basic assumptions of our culture. The base assumption is that the larger the project, the more control you need. If you want to build something big, you need managers and managers to manage the managers.

The Web is the largest collection of human intellect we’ve ever built. It’s also the most usable and reliable. The Web is a permission-free zone.

Most of our institutions are built around the urge to control. But now the walls are down. A business isn’t the best sort of information about its products. You want to find other users. If you want to know how it is to drive a Mini Cooper in Boston in the winter, you’re not going to get the best information from the Mini Cooper website.

Broadcast gives the same message to everybody to drive down the cost of marketing. The only issue with this is that there’s no market for messages. Nobody likes being messaged. So we’re engaged in war with our customers, trying to make them listen to something they don’t want to hear.

Whole notion of markets has been affected by the notion of messages. Actual markets consist of customers and they’re talking all the time. We do it in discussion sites, mailing lists and consumer rating sites.

What is more boring than classified ads? They’re boring. But on Craigslist, we talk about what we’re posting in classified ads. And we do it through tags. We are so social that we even make bookmarks into a social activity.

Marketing, business and media are all about fake, phony voices. Conversations are open and honest.

What weblogs aren’t. They’re not about cats. They’re not about people in their pajamas writing about cats. They’re about things that we care about.

Encyclopedia Britannica has 65,000 important topics. Wikipedia has 1.5 million topics, including the deep-fried Mars bar and the heavy metal umlaut. Britannica is constrained by the physical because 65,000 topics fill 32 volumes.

Blogs aren’t journalism. They’re blank pieces of paper. The fact that they’ve been judged in the context of journalism is because the media can’t get past itself.

Journalists define their value in terms of their judgment. That has passed into the hands of readers. Since people first began exchanging news articles by e-mail, judgment passed into the hands of users. That’s our front page, what we recommend to each other. The Web is a recommendation engine and it has been since the beginning. A good example of how this plays out is Digg.

This week, USAToday introduced a bunch of conversational components, including Digg-like recommendations. But there’s only a thumbs-up, not a thumbs-down. This misses a key characteristic of readers, which is we want revenge. USAToday also introduced bloggers on its site. This is a titanic change, also links to things outside of USAToday.

We’ve been telling businesses for a couple of decades that information is important and businesses want to control important things. It turns out that NOT controlling the information actually makes it better.

Blogs aren’t professional. They are written sub-optimally. You don’t have time to ponder and polish. We give them pre-emptive forgiveness. There is an acknowledgement of human fallibility, the very thing that marketing messages don’t have. Marketing messages are perfect and we hate that. Humans are fallible. They make us human in ways that marketers won’t permit.

Bloggers with just a few people linking to them are little knots of community. Every blogroll link is a little act of selflessness. The Web was built out of these little acts of generosity.

Home page of NY Times: Every link on the home page links back to the New York Times, except those that link to ads. This is narcissism.

Blogs aren’t simple: Good marketing is supposed to be boiling things down to a few memorable words. But ideas aren’t simple. A Bush position paper 2,500 words long generated more than 2,500 links from bloggers. We take things that appear simple and make them complex. We’ve been living under this regime of broadcast simplicity. We’ve been spoken to as morons for years but we don’t speak to each other that way.

Blogs aren’t content – Content is really important, but it’s not just the content. If you go into a store and take a shopping cart and take all the clothing that fits you and nothing else and put it in a pile, they’ll throw you out. That’s because they own the organization. But if you put up a website where people can’t find what they want, they’ll throw you out. People want to own the organization.

You shouldn’t believe what you read in Wikipedia. That doesn’t mean it isn’t credible. If you read an article on something you know about, you’ll probably find errors. You look at how heavily it’s been edited. Look at the discussion pages, which have amazing learned discussions. What makes Wikipedia credible is that it puts up notices about articles that are suspect. There are more than 100 warnings available and you can create your own.

The presence of these warnings saying that this article isn’t perfect makes Wikipedia more credible. It’s more interested in informing us that speaking as the voice of God. It’s more interested in having us come to informed beliefs. You’ll never see these notices in the NY Times, Britannica or marketing materials.

The attempt to be infallible drives out credibility and makes us look like assholes.

Peer-to-peer is about us making the communication world ours again. Wikipedia is for us. It’s ours. It cares first and foremost about us. Craigslist is ours. People fall in love and get married on Craigslist.

YouTube is ours. It enables us to organize content the way that we want to, the way no TV channel ever could. It feels like ours. It exists for us.

Google feels like ours. That simple home page feels personal. If marketers saw that home page, they’d want to throw all kinds of ads around it.

Labels: blogging, newcommforum, social_media, tagging

  ¶ 3:08 PM 0 Comments Links to this post

  Tap customer conversations for blog content Lee Odden suggests that customer interaction can be great blog material.

It's a good idea. Lots of businesses have customer service groups and many of them capture customer conversations in their databases. Why not take the best questions and answers, clean them up and expose them on a blog? So what if it's the same as an FAQ? This approach is faster and it'll probably do better on search results.

Add this to your list of successful approaches to blogging that don't require a lot of time or money.

Labels: blogging, open_source

  ¶ 8:51 AM 0 Comments Links to this post

  Shady ethics in the blogosphere Scott Kirsner, former Boston Globe writer, has a thoughtful piece on disclosure in the blogosphere. He points out the ethical dilemmas posed by business' efforts to court bloggers with free stuff and even cash payments for positive coverage. There is no code of ethics in the blogosphere, of course, outside of perhaps the Cluetrain Manifesto, so it's up to the readers to decide whom to believe.

Personally, I believe this issue will work itself out at the grass roots level. Look at Engadget and BoingBoing, which are two of the most popular and successful blogs. They need to uphold high standards or their audiences would quickly desert them. The same holds true at less-popular titles. The blogosphere is self-policing, and any popular blogger who tries to deceive his or her audience will be quickly smoked out. Once you get a reputation for shady ethics, it's very difficult to recover. Any blogger who wants to build a long-term franchise will be very careful not to cross that line.

There will always be con men in social media, but their influence will be limited. The readers will see to that.

Labels: blogging, ethics

  ¶ 6:10 AM 3 Comments Links to this post

  The New Journalism: customized reporting Andy Abramson, a PR guy who is also one of the most widely read journalists blogging about VOIP, has posted an interesing essay about Creative Video Blogging and The New "Instant Journalism." His thinking mirrors my own in many respects: in the future journalism will be an amalgam of input from a variety of linked sources. The consumer will have the option of drilling down for more information on almost anything.

Labels: blogging, journalism, mainstream_media

  ¶ 9:41 AM 0 Comments Links to this post